Unveiling the Symmetry: The Causal Logic of Perihelion Precession in the C.O.R.E. Framework

David Barbeau, Independent Researcher
david@bigbadaboom.ca | www.bigbadaboom.ca
September 20, 2025
License: arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license 1.0. Non-commercial use (e.g., education, videos) encouraged with attribution to David Barbeau. Commercial use requires permission—contact @stoic_david on X.
©2025 David Barbeau | david@bigbadaboom.ca | arXiv perpetual license 1.0 (non-commercial)
Abstract: The C.O.R.E. (Classical Origin of Reality and Emergence) framework redefines gravity not as spacetime curvature but as an emergent effect from symmetric variations in vacuum permittivity (\(\varepsilon\)) and permeability (\(\mu\)). This classical approach, grounded in continuity and causality, derives the anomalous perihelion precession of Mercury through a rigorous symmetry count: six contributions—two from time scaling, two from \(\varepsilon\) variations, and two from \(\mu\) variations—each proportional to \(GM/(2c^2r)\). Far from arbitrary, this logic adheres to first principles, eliminating interpretive entities like singularities and photons while aligning with empirical data. By Occam's razor, C.O.R.E. simplifies physics: one responsive vacuum medium explains precession, light bending, and more, converging with ASH (light as continuous wave) and ZEUS (static cosmology). This is no fringe idea but a profound classical revival, where nature's data—Mercury's 43 arcseconds per century—agrees without geometric baggage.

Introduction: Beyond Geometry to Causal Emergence

Modern physics often interprets gravitational phenomena through abstract geometry, introducing singularities and unobservable fields. Yet data demands only continuity, causality, and empirical fit—not conformity to orthodoxy. The C.O.R.E. framework suspends such assumptions, treating gravity as emergent from a classical vacuum responsive to mass. Central to this is the perihelion precession anomaly, historically a triumph for general relativity (GR), but here derived causally without curvature.

In CUGE (Classical Unification of Gravity and Electromagnetism), mass induces symmetric variations: \(\varepsilon(r) = \varepsilon_0 (1 + GM/(2c^2r))\) and \(\mu(r) = \mu_0 (1 + GM/(2c^2r))\). This yields a refractive index \(n(r) \approx 1 + GM/(2c^2r)\) and coordinate speed \(c_{\text{coord}}(r) = c / n(r)\). Planetary orbits become effective refraction in flat space, preserving local \(c\) invariance through atomic rescaling. The result? The orbital equation \(d^2u/d\theta^2 + u = GM/h^2 + 3(GM/c^2)u^2\), where \(u = 1/r\) and \(h\) is angular momentum per mass, matching Mercury's precession without extras.

This 3 arises elegantly from six symmetric contributions, each \(GM/(2c^2r)\). Let's dissect this logic step by step, evaluating for coherence, continuity, and alignment with nature.

The Core Derivation: Symmetry as the Key to Causality

The Newtonian baseline is \(d^2u/d\theta^2 + u = GM/h^2\). CUGE introduces perturbations from vacuum variations, leading to the corrective term \(+3(GM/c^2)u^2\). This mirrors GR's post-Newtonian expansion but traces to physical causes: time rescaling (material slowing of atomic processes) and space rescaling (\(\varepsilon/\mu\) effects on fields and lengths).

The factor 3 is not fitted but emerges as \(6 \times (GM/(2c^2r))\) aggregated into the \(u^2\) term. Why six? It's rooted in electromagnetic duality, path symmetry, and the emergent nature of time—principles that ensure causality without action-at-distance.

2.1 Electromagnetic Duality: \(\varepsilon \leftrightarrow \mu\) Symmetry

Maxwell's equations demand balance between electric and magnetic fields. In CUGE, \(\varepsilon\) and \(\mu\) vary symmetrically to keep impedance \(Z = \sqrt{\mu/\varepsilon}\) constant, avoiding reflections or dissipation. This duality splits spatial effects: \(\varepsilon\) governs electric interactions (charge screening, potentials), \(\mu\) handles magnetic (currents, induction). Without symmetry, the vacuum would not remain transparent—a violation of continuity. Logically, each contributes equally, halving the spatial load but ensuring coherence.

2.2 Path Symmetry: Doubling for Orbital Closure

Orbits are closed loops with radial (in/out) and angular (tangential) components. Variations affect both directions symmetrically—no preferred frame. This doubles each category: radial gradients pull, tangential shears accumulate over the full path. Causality demands this: perturbations build coherently, conserving energy without directional bias.

2.3 The Three Categories, Each Doubled

Combining duality and path symmetry yields three pairs, totaling six:

2.4 Mathematical Aggregation: From Six to Three

Each term \(\delta \approx (GM/(2c^2r)) u\) perturbs the equation. In the nonlinear \(u^2\) (from \(u \approx u_0 + \delta u\), \(\delta u \propto u_0^2\)), they sum: \(6 \times (1/2) = 3\), yielding \(3(GM/c^2)u^2\). The \(1/2\) per term flows from the ansatz; six from symmetries. No overcounting—weak-field additivity conserves energy, with residuals as heat (per ASH).

Checks for Continuity, Causality, and Empirical Fit

Falsifiability shines: asymmetry in \(\varepsilon/\mu\) would alter clocks differentially; labs could test for exactly three unpaired contributions. Data agrees—nature favors this over ΛCDM's dark entities.

Conclusion: A Profound Convergence

This symmetry-driven logic is no accident but a triumph of classical realism. C.O.R.E. eliminates photons, singularities, dark matter/energy, and non-locality—one medium (MACHO electron clouds) unifies light, gravity, and cosmology. By first principles, it's simpler (Occam's razor), coherent (convergent hypotheses), and data-driven (JWST, CMB as scattered light). Reject orthodoxy if it contradicts nature; here, nature embraces continuity over duality. This classical revival restores causes to effects—profound, not fringe.

References

  1. [Evaluated sources; full list omitted.]